Document control record
Document prepared by:
Company name
Registration number
Address line 1
Address line 2
Address line 3
T |
Company
telephone |
A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of:
a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version.
b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.
Report title |
2nd Monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report (December 2024) |
|||||
Document code |
EM&A-02 |
Project number |
P526864 |
|||
File path |
|
|||||
Client |
Client |
|||||
Client contact |
|
Client reference |
|
|||
Author |
Reviewer |
Verifier
|
||||
1 |
09/01/2025 |
First Issue |
Kitty Wang |
Ray Yan |
|
F. C. Tsang |
2 |
13/01/2025 |
Second Issue |
Kitty Wang |
Ray Yan |
|
F. C. Tsang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author signature |
|
Certified by |
|
Name |
Kitty Wang |
Name |
F. C. Tsang |
Title |
Environmental Team Consultant |
Title |
Environmental Team Leader |
Contents
1.3 Construction Works Programme and Construction Works Area
1.4 Summary of Environmental Status
2.3 Monitoring Parameter and Frequency and Duration
2.7 Action and Limit Level for Air Quality Monitoring
3 Construction Noise Monitoring
3.3 Noise Monitoring Parameter, Frequency and Duration
3.4 Monitoring Equipment, Methodology and QA / QC Procedure
3.5 Maintenance and Calibration
4.3 Monitoring Parameter and Frequency
4.4 Sampling Depths & Replication
4.8 Action and Limit Level for Water Quality Monitoring
8 Environmental Site Inspection and Audit
8.1 Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
9 Summary of Monitoring Exceedance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecutions
9.2 Summary of Environmental Non-Compliance
9.3 Summary of Environmental Complaint
9.4 Summary of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecution
10.1 Works and Potential Environmental Issues in the next Reporting Period
11.2 Comments/ Recommendations
Appendices
Appendix 1.1 Construction Programme
Appendix 1.2 Project Organization Chart
Appendix 1.3 Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measure
Appendix 1.4 Impact Monitoring Schedule of the Reporting Month
Appendix 2.1 Calibration Certificates of Impact Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
Appendix 2.2 Impact Air Quality Monitoring Data
Appendix 2.3 Weather Information during the Reporting Period
Appendix 2.4 Event and Action Plan for Air Quality
Appendix 3.1 Calibration Certificates of Impact Noise Monitoring Equipment
Appendix 3.2 Impact Noise Monitoring Data
Appendix 3.3 Event and Action Plan for Noise
Appendix 4.1 Calibration Certificates of Impact Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Appendix 4.2 Impact Water Quality Monitoring Data
Appendix 4.3 Quality Control Report for Suspended Solids
Appendix 4.4 Event and Action Plan for Water Quality
Appendix 5.1 Summary of Monthly Waste Flow Table
Appendix 7.1 Event and Action Plan for Landscape and Visual
Appendix 9.1 Complaint Log
Appendix 10.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule of Next Reporting Month
Figures
Figure 1.1 General Site Location Plan
Figure 2.1 Impact Air Quality Monitoring Locations
Figure 3.1 Impact Noise Monitoring Locations
Figure 4.1 Impact Water Quality Monitoring Locations
Tables
Table A1 Summary of EM&A activities in the Reporting Period
Table A2 Summary of Exceedances in the Previous Reporting Period (November 2024)
Table A3 Summary of Exceedances in the Reporting Period
Table 1.1 Parties Involved in Project Organisation
Table 1.2 Status of Environmental License, Notifications and Permits for Contract 1
Table 1.3 Status of Environmental License, Notifications and Permits for Contract 2
Table 2.1 Summary of Impact Air Quality Monitoring Stations in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Table 2.2 Parameters measured in the Impact Air Quality Monitoring
Table 2.3 Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 2.4 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 2.5 Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 2.6 Summary of Air Quality Monitoring Results in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Table 3.1 Construction Noise Monitoring Stations near in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Table 3.2 Construction Noise Monitoring Parameter, Frequency and Duration
Table 3.3 Construction Noise Monitoring Equipment
Table 3.4 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise Monitoring
Table 3.5 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Table 4.1 Summary of Impact Water Quality Monitoring Stations in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Table 4.2 Parameters measured in the Impact Water Quality Monitoring
Table 4.3 Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 4.4 Method for Laboratory Analysis for Water Samples
Table 4.5 Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Table 4.6 Action and Limit Levels of Water Quality
Table 4.7 Summary of Exceedance Records of Water Quality Monitoring in related to the works contracts in the previous reporting period (November 2024)
Table 4.8 Summary of Exceedance Records of Water Quality Monitoring in related to the works contracts in the previous reporting period (November 2024)
Table 4.9 Summary of Exceedance Records of Water Quality Monitoring in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Table 5.1 Summary of Waste Generated by the Construction Works in related to the Works Contracts in the Reporting Period
Table 6.1 Schedule for Bat Roost Survey at Contract 2 during the Reporting Period
Table 6.2 Upcoming Schedule for Bat Roost Survey at Contract 2 in the Next Reporting Period
Table 8.1 Site Observations at Contract 1 during the reporting period
Table 8.2 Site Observations at Contract 2 during the reporting period
Executive Summary
A1. This is the 2nd Monthly Environment Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report for Hung Shui Kiu/Ha Tsuen New Development Area Second Phase Development (the Project). This report was prepared by Aurecon Hong Kong Limited (Aurecon) under Service Contract No. WD/03/2023 Hung Shui Kiu/Ha Tsuen New Development Area Second Phase Development - Environmental Team (hereinafter called the Service Contract). This report documents the findings of EM&A works at Contract No. YL/2023/01 (hereinafter called the Contract 1) and Contract No. YL/2023/02 (hereinafter called the Contract 2) under the Project during the reporting period from 1 to 31 December 2024.
A2. The construction phase EM&A programme started on 1 November 2024.
Key Construction Works in the Reporting PeriodA3. A summary of construction activities undertaken during the reporting period is presented below:
· Caring Visit;
· Tree Survey;
· Site Appraisal;
· Underground Utility Detection;
· Ground Investigation Works.
Contract 2
· Site Survey;
· Tree Felling;
· Ground Investigation;
· Tree Transplant;
· Earthworks;
· Piezometer / Standpipe Installation.
Environmental Monitoring and Audit ProgrammeA4. The monthly EM&A programme was undertaken by the ET in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022). A summary of the monitoring and audit activities during the reporting period is presented in Table A1.
Table A1 Summary of EM&A activities in the Reporting Period
EM&A Activities |
Date |
Air Quality Monitoring |
3, 5, 9, 10, 14,16, 19, 21, 24, 27, 30 December 2024 |
Noise Monitoring |
3, 12, 17, 24 and 31 December 2024 |
Water Quality Monitoring |
2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, 20, 23, 27 and 30 December 2024 |
Weekly Environmental Site Inspection (Contract 1) |
6, 13, 20 and 27 December 2024 |
Weekly Environmental Site Inspection (Contract 2) |
6, 10, 20 and 27 December 2024 |
A5. Summary of the environmental exceedances of the previous reporting period (November 2024) is tabulated in Table A2.
Table A2 Summary of Exceedances in the Previous Reporting Period (November 2024)
Environmental Monitoring |
Parameter |
No. of Exceedances |
Total No. of Exceedances |
No. of Non-project Related Exceedances |
Total No. of Non-project Related Exceedances |
No. of Exceedances Related to the Project |
Total No. of Exceedances Related to the Project |
||||
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
||||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Noise |
Leq(30mins) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Water Quality |
DO |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Turbidity |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
pH |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
A6. Summary of the environmental exceedances of the reporting period is tabulated in Table A3.
Table A3 Summary of Exceedances in the Reporting Period
Environmental Monitoring |
Parameter |
No. of Exceedances |
Total No. of Exceedances |
No. of Non-project Related Exceedances |
Total No. of Non-project Related Exceedances |
No. of Exceedances Related to the Project |
Total No. of Exceedances Related to the Project |
||||
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
||||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Noise |
Leq(30mins) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Turbidity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
pH |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Air Quality
A7. No Action Level or Limit Level exceedance was recorded for air quality monitoring in the reporting period.
Noise
A8. No Action Level or Limit Level exceedance was recorded for construction noise monitoring in the reporting period.
Water Quality
A9. During the previous reporting period (November 2024), 3 action level of exceedances for DO were recorded. 10 limit level of exceedances for turbidity were recorded. 5 action level of exceedances for SS were recorded. 7 limit level of exceedances for pH were recorded. After investigation, all the exceedances are considered as non-project related.
A10. All water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting period. No Action or Limit Level exceedance was recorded during impact water quality monitoring in the reporting period.
Complaint LogA11. No environmental complaint was received in the reporting period.
Notification of Summons and Successful ProsecutionsA12. No notification of summons or successful prosecutions was received in the reporting period.
Reporting ChangesA13. There was no reporting change in the reporting period.
Future Key IssuesA14. The major site activities for the next reporting period are summarized below:
· Caring Visit;
· Tree Survey;
· Site Appraisal;
· Underground Utility Detection;
· Ground Investigation Works;
· Realign of Bar Fencing;
· Demolition Works;
· Utilities Laying Works;
· Construction of CLC & PMs Office Footing.
Contract 2
· Site Survey;
· Tree Felling;
· Ground Investigation Works;
· Tree Transplant;
· Earthworks;
· Piezometer / Standpipe Installation;
· Site Office Setup.
1.1.1 The HSK/HT NDA occupies an area of approximately 714 hectares and is located at the north-western part of the New Territories, midway between the Tuen Mun and Tin Shui Wai New Towns. The sites included scatted land pieces in the area near-by the proposed HSK Station, bounded by Castle Peak Road (Hung Shui Kiu) Castle Peak Road to the south, Kong Sham Western Highway to the west and Tin Shui Wai MTR Station. The HSK/HT NDA will provide associated engineering infrastructure and supply land for subsequent development of public and private housing, community facilities, commercial and industrial premises, the Green Transit Corridor (comprising the Environmentally Friendly Transport Services, footpaths and cycle tracks) and other uses, and for construction of the proposed infrastructure works such as district distributor roads, local roads, revitalisation of existing channels, sewerage (including pumping stations), drainage (including pumping stations), water supply, landscaping, electrical and mechanical (E&M), and associated works.
1.1.2 Currently, the HSK/HT NDA development will be implemented in three phases, comprising First Phase, Second Phase and Remaining Phase development. The First Phase development which comprises the site information and engineering infrastructure works under Advance Works Phases 1 and 2 and Stage 1 Works has commenced construction in 2020.
1.1.3 The HSK/HT NDA Advance Works Phase 3 and Stage 2 Works are collectively called Second Phase development (also known as HSK/HT NDA Second Phase Development the Project). The HSK/HT NDA Advance Works Phase 3 includes site formation and engineering infrastructure works for the site for Dedicated Rehousing Estate (DRE), residential and industrial uses and Government/Institution or Community (G/IC) developments. It also comprises construction of engineering infrastructure works, including a primary distributor road, district distributor roads, local roads, drainage, sewerage (including pumping stations), water supply, landscaping, E&M and associated works as environmental mitigation measures and EM&A programme. The HSK/HT NDA Stage 2 Works includes site information and engineering infrastructure works for the commercial, residential and G/IC developments in the proposed town centre around the proposed HSK Station, logistics, industrial corporate and technology zones village resite, and the remaining batch of multi-storey buildings.
1.1.4 The Project will be delivered under seven works contracts as below and the general layout plan of the works contracts, except Contract 7 of which the exact extent and scope of works are subject to review, is shown in Figure 1.1.
Contract 1
· Site clearance and formation (including land decontamination works) for about 30 hectares of lands, together with provision of associated engineering infrastructure
· Construction of Local Roads L6, L7 and L8
· Construction of associated works including footpaths, cycle tracks, drainage, sewerage, landscaping works and other ancillary works
· Relocation and provision of Community Liaison Centre (CLC)
· Implementation of environmental mitigation measures (including noise barriers and low-noise road surfacing)
Contract 2
· Site clearance and formation for about 8.5 hectares of lands
· Construction of Tan Kwai Tsuen East Fresh Water Service Reservoir and associated roadworks, power supply and landscaping works
· Laying of about 4.5 km long freshwater mains and about 3.5 km long flushing water mains
· Implementation of environmental mitigation measures and related environmental monitoring and audit programme for the works mentioned above
Contract 3
· Site clearance and formation (including land decontamination works) for about 60 hectares of lands, together with provision of associated engineering infrastructure
· Construction of Roads D6, D8, L5, L9, L10, L12, L13, L14, L15, L16, road connection between Road P1 and D6 and road connection between Road P1 and Castle Peak Road and relocation of parking area of MTR Emergency Access Point (EAP) 26 in Tuen Mun
· Construction of Footbridge FB13
· Construction of Underpass UP1
· Realignment of Tin Sam Channel
· Construction of Sewage Pumping Station SPS1
· Construction of associated works including footpaths, cycle tracks, drainage, sewerage, water supply, box culvert, district cooling mains, Common Utility Tunnel, landscaping, E&M works and other ancillary works
· Implementation of environmental mitigation measures (including noise barriers and low-noise road surfacing)
Contract 4
· Site clearance and formation (including land decontamination works) for about 57 hectares of lands, together with provision of associated engineering infrastructure
· Construction of Roads D6, D7, L1, L17, L18, L21, L22, L23, L25 and L35
· Construction of river crossing footbridge FB5, FB9, FB8, FB8A, FB8B, FB8C and FB10 and Pedestrian Subway SW6
· River Revitalisation of Tin Sam Channel
· Construction of Sewage Pumping Station SPS3
· Construction of associated works including footpaths, cycle tracks, drainage, sewerage, water supply, box culvert, district cooling mains, landscaping, E&M works and other ancillary works
· Implementation of environmental mitigation measures (including noise barriers and low noise road surfacing)
Contract 5
· Site clearance and formation (including land decontamination works) for about 60 hectares of lands, together with provision of associated engineering infrastructure
· Construction of primary distributor, district distributor and local roads connecting Hung Shui Kiu/Ha Tsuen New Development Area to Ping Ha Road, Ha Tsuen Road and Castle Peak Road
· Construction of vehicular bridges
· Construction of pedestrian footbridges and subways
· Construction of a sewage pumping station
· Construction of nature terrain hazard mitigation measures
· Construction of associated works including water mains, drainage and sewerage works, district cooling mains, cycle tracks, footpaths, box culverts, junction improvement works, slope works, retaining walls, street furniture, landscaping works, electrical and mechanical works and other ancillary works
Contract 6
· Site clearance and formation (including land decontamination works) for about 70 hectares of lands, together with provision of associated engineering infrastructure
· Construction of Roads D3, D5, L30 and L31 and associated connections
· Construction of Sewage Pumping Station SPS4
· Construction of floodable open spaces and the associated drainage works
· Construction of associated works including footpaths, cycle tracks, drainage, sewerage, water supply, landscaping, E&M works and ancillary works
Contract 7
· All remaining landscaping works to regional, district and local open space, landscape within the streetscape, landscape to the floodable open spaces and landscape to river revitalization or polder areas
1.1.5 Aurecon was commissioned by CEDD to provide EM&A services for the works contracts in relation to the Project pursuant to the requirements as specified in relevant EP, the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022) and the approved EIA Report for the Project to discharge the duties of the ET for the Project, including the baseline monitoring works for various monitoring parameters (e.g. AQM, CNM, WQM, etc.).
1.1.6 This is the 2nd Monthly EM&A Report summarizing the key findings of the construction phase EM&A programme at Contract 1 and Contract 2 from 1 December to 31 December 2024 (the reporting period) and is submitted to fulfil the requirements in Condition 3.3 of the EPs (i.e. EP-531/2017, EP-530/2017, EP-529/2017, EP-528/2017 & EP-527/2017) and Section 15.3 of the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022) of the Project.
1.2 Project Organisation 1.2.1 Parties with different levels of involvement in the Project organisation are summarized in Table 1.1.Table 1.1 Parties Involved in Project Organisation
Parties |
Organization / Company |
|
Project Proponent |
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) |
|
Supervisor / Engineers Representative (ER) |
Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Limited |
|
Contractor |
Contract No. YL/2023/01 (Contract 1) |
Sang Hing Kuly Joint Venture (SKJV) |
Contract No. YL/2023/02 (Contract 2) |
Chun Wo - Build king - Yee Hop Joint Venture (CWBKYH JV) |
|
Environmental Team (ET) |
Aurecon Hong Kong Limited |
|
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) |
Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited |
Contract 1
· Caring Visit;
· Tree Survey;
· Site Appraisal;
· Underground Utility Detection;
· Ground Investigation Works
Contract 2
· Tree Transplant;
· Site Survey;
· Tree Felling;
· Ground Investigation;
· Tree Transplant;
· Earthworks;
· Piezometer / Standpipe Installation.
1.4 Summary of Environmental Status 1.4.1 A summary of the relevant permits, licences, and/or notifications on environmental protection for the work contracts that are involved in this reporting period is presented in Table 1.2 and Table 1.3 respectively.Table 1.2 Status of Environmental License, Notifications and Permits for Contract 1
Permit / License Name/No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
|
From |
To |
||
Environmental Permit |
|||
EP-527/2017 |
21/02/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
EP-528/2017 |
21/02/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
EP-529/2017 |
21/02/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
EP-530/2017 |
21/02/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
Notification pursuant to Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
|||
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Under application |
Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
|||
7051388 |
24/06/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Registration of Chemical Waste Producer |
|||
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Under application |
Effluent Discharge License under Water Pollution Control Ordinance |
|||
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Under application (Part T, Part E4) |
Construction Noise Permit (CNP) |
|
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Under application (Demolition of Existing Gantry at Part T) |
Table 1.3 Status of Environmental License, Notifications and Permits for Contract 2
Permit / License Name/No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
|
From |
To |
||
Notification pursuant to Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
|||
Notification that notifiable works are anticipated to commence (Area A) (EPD Ref. number: 10005847) |
13/06/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Notification that notifiable works are anticipated to commence (Area B) (EPD Ref. number: 10006337) |
26/06/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Notification that notifiable works are anticipated to commence (Area C) (EPD Ref. number: 10006331) |
26/06/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Notification that notifiable works are anticipated to commence (Area D) (EPD Ref. number: 10006336) |
26/06/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
|||
7051428 |
26/06/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Account for Registration of Chemical Waste Producer |
|||
WPN: 5213442C498201 |
13/08/2024 |
N/A |
Valid |
Effluent Discharge License under Water Pollution Control Ordinance |
|||
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Under application (Site Area B) |
Construction Noise Permit (CNP) |
|
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
2 Air Quality Monitoring 2.1 Monitoring Requirement 2.1.1 In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), the ET shall carry out impact monitoring during the construction phase of the Project. 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) should be conducted at a frequency of at least three times in every six days when the highest dust impact occurs. 2.2 Monitoring Location 2.2.1 According to the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), the designated locations for impact air quality monitoring in related to the works contracts in the reporting period are listed in Table 2.1 and their locations are shown in Figure 2.1.
Table 2.1 Summary of Impact Air Quality Monitoring Stations in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Station(s) |
EIA ID |
Monitoring Location |
AM1 |
A204 |
Kam Cheong Garden |
AM2 |
A208 |
Oaklands Court |
AM3 |
A209 |
Ling Liang Church Primary School |
AM4 |
A310 |
Tin Ha Road Playground |
AM5 |
A415 |
Tin Sum Tsuen |
AM6 |
A410 |
Galore Garden |
AM7 |
A414 |
Shek Po Tusen |
AM8a(1) (2) |
A813 |
Block J, Tin Shing Court |
AM10 |
A802 |
Kiu Tau Wai |
AM11 |
A703 |
Sha Chau Lei Tsuen |
AM12 |
A704 |
Ha Tsuen Shi |
AM14 |
A601 |
Tseung Kong Wai |
AM22 |
P240 |
Planned Village Resite at Site 4-20 |
AM24 |
P1501 |
Planned Port Back-up, Storage and Workshop at Site 3-8 |
AM25a |
- |
San Wai Sewage Treatment Works |
Notes:
(1) AM8a is the alternative noise monitoring stations proposed to replace AM8.
(2) As the Owners Corporation for Tin Shing Court refused to grant the permission to access to carry out the set-up of monitoring equipment at the proposed location for subsequent impact monitoring period, a new location, which is at a short distance from the original location (25m), has been then identified and submitted through the proposal of the alternative monitoring location for the impact monitoring. Agreement has been obtained from IEC upon proposal of the alternative monitoring location for the impact monitoring at AM8a.
2.2.2 In accordance with the Table A2.4 in Appendix A of the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), impact air quality monitoring will be carried out at monitoring stations AM22, AM24 and AM25a after the occupation of the planned port back-up, storage and workshop, and the planned village resite. 2.2.3 As confirmed with ER, the planned port back-up, storages and workshops at Site 3-8, Site 3-14 and the planned village resite Site 4-20 are not constructed yet. Thus, the impact air quality monitoring will be carried out at AM22, AM24 and AM25a after the construction and occupation of these planned port back-up, storages and workshops, and the planned village resite. No air quality monitoring of the mentioned stations was carried out in this reporting period. 2.3 Monitoring Parameter and Frequency and Duration 2.3.1 In accordance to the requirements for placement of equipment, as set out in Section 4.7.1 of the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022) of the Project, the monitoring parameter, frequency and duration of impact air quality monitoring are listed in Table 2.2.Table 2.2 Parameters measured in the Impact Air Quality Monitoring
Parameter |
Frequency |
Duration |
1-hour TSP |
3 times for every 6 days |
Throughout the construction phase |
Table 2.3 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Manufacturer |
Model |
Quantity |
Serial No. |
Direct Reading Dust Meter |
Sibata |
LD-5R |
6 |
467356 467357 467358 467359 467360 467361 |
2.5 Monitoring Methodology 2.5.1 The 1-hr TSP was sampled by drawing air into the portable dust monitor where particular concentrations were measured instantaneously with an in-built silicon detector sensing light scattered by the particulates in the sampled air. Continuous TSP levels were indicated and logged by a built-in data logger compatible with Windows based program to facilitate data collection, analysis and reporting. 2.5.2 The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter was undertaken in accordance with the Manufacturers Instruction Manual as follows:
Placed the 1-hour dust meter at least 1.5m above ground;
Set POWER to ON and make sure that the battery level was not flashed or in low level;
Pulled the air sampling inlet cover up;
Pushed the knob at MEASURE position;
Set time/mode setting to [BG] by pushing the time setting switch. Then, started the background measurement by pushing the start/stop switch once. It took 6 sec. to complete the background measurement;
Turned knob to SENSI. ADJ position and pressed in;
Pushed Start/Stop switch once;
Gently returned knob to the MEASURE position;
Pushed the time setting switch to change the time setting display to [LOG] at the bottom left of the liquid crystal display;
Removed the cap and started measurement; and
Information such as sampling date, time, count value and site condition were recorded during the monitoring period
2.6 Maintenance/Calibration 2.6.1 The following maintenance/calibration was required for the direct dust meters: 2.6.2 Check and calibrate the dust meter by high volume sampler (HVS) to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method. Calibration of dust meter should be carried out every twelve months throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring. The calibration certificates of the monitoring equipment are presented in Appendix 2.1. 2.6.3 The correlation coefficient was checked to establish the correlation relationship between the handheld dust meter and HVS. The correlation factor was determined by comparing the results of HVS and handheld dust meter. 2.6.4 Checking is made prior to air quality monitoring commencing to ensure all equipment is in good working condition with necessary power supply. Zero count test were conducted before and after each monitoring event. 2.7 Action and Limit Level for Air Quality Monitoring 2.7.1 The baseline monitoring results formed the basis for determining the air quality criteria for the impact monitoring. The ET shall compare the impact monitoring results with air quality criteria set up for 1-hour TSP. Based on the baseline dust monitoring data and the derivation criteria specified above, the Action/Limit Levels are presented in Table 2.5.Table 2.5 Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
AM1 |
266 |
500 |
AM2 |
271 |
|
AM3 |
273 |
|
AM4 |
268 |
|
AM5 |
272 |
|
AM6 |
271 |
|
AM7 |
282 |
|
AM8a |
267 |
|
AM10 |
271 |
|
AM11 |
276 |
|
AM12 |
273 |
|
AM14 |
280 |
|
AM22 |
274 |
|
AM24(1) |
290 |
|
AM25a(1) |
300 |
Note:
(1) The Action Level of AM24 an AM25a was determined in the baseline monitoring under the baseline air quality monitoring of HSK/HT NDA Stage 1 Works in December 2021.
2.8 Results and Observations 2.8.1 All air quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting period. The air quality monitoring schedule for this reporting period is shown in Appendix 1.4. 2.8.2 The air quality monitoring results in related to the works contracts in the reporting period are summarized in Table 2.6. No Action or Limit levels exceedance was recorded in the reporting period. Details of the results and graphical presentation are shown in Appendix 2.2.
Table 2.6 Summary of Air Quality Monitoring Results in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Monitoring Station |
Averaged Measured Value (μg/m3) |
Minimum Measured Value (μg/m3) |
Maximum Measured Value (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level, (μg/m3) |
AM1 |
36 |
22 |
46 |
266 |
500 |
AM2 |
45 |
20 |
68 |
271 |
|
AM3 |
39 |
19 |
59 |
273 |
|
AM4 |
24 |
14 |
32 |
268 |
|
AM5 |
39 |
20 |
61 |
272 |
|
AM6 |
35 |
15 |
52 |
271 |
|
AM7 |
41 |
13 |
67 |
282 |
|
AM8a |
46 |
10 |
106 |
267 |
|
AM10 |
46 |
17 |
106 |
271 |
|
AM11 |
37 |
12 |
68 |
276 |
|
AM12 |
41 |
16 |
90 |
273 |
|
AM14 |
42 |
14 |
88 |
280 |
2.8.4 Weather condition of the whole baseline monitoring period varied from sunny to rainy. Wind data during the period of baseline monitoring from the Hong Kong Observatory Lau Fau Shan Wind Station (22.46889N, 113.98361E), which is located about 1.25 km from the nearest site boundary of Contract 6. The weather information during the reporting period is summarized in Appendix 2.3.
2.9 Event and Action Plan 2.9.1 Should any non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Appendix 2.4 shall be followed. Investigation of the exceedances of environmental quality performance limits should be conducted, and the ET will immediately notify the IEC and EPD, as appropriate. The notification should be followed up with advice to the IEC and EPD on the results of the investigation, proposed actions and success of the action taken, with any necessary follow-up proposals.3 Construction Noise Monitoring 3.1 Monitoring Requirements 3.1.1 In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), the ET shall carry out impact monitoring during the construction phase of the Project in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq) to monitor the construction noise arising from the construction activities. The regular monitoring frequency for each monitoring station was on a weekly basis and one set of measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays shall be conducted. 3.2 Monitoring Locations 3.2.1 According to the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), the monitoring designated locations for construction noise monitoring in related to the works contracts in the reporting period are listed in Table 3.1 and shown in Figure 3.1.
Table 3.1 Construction Noise Monitoring Stations near in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Monitoeing Station |
EIA ID |
Location |
Nature of Uses |
Type of Measurement |
CM1(2) |
ETCW02 |
No. 739, Oaklands Court |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM2 (2) |
ESFW01 |
No. 332, Chung Uk Tsuen |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM3 (2) |
ESFW02 |
Village house, Nai Wai |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM4a (1) (2) |
|
Village Representative Building at Chung Uk Tsuen |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM10 |
ETSW11 |
YLPMSAA Tang Siu Tong Secondary School |
Educational Institution |
Façade |
CM13 |
ESLUT01 |
No. 46A San Lee Uk Tsuen |
Residential |
Façade |
CM14 (2) |
|
No. 62, San Lee Uk Tsuen |
Residential |
Free Field |
CM15a (1) (2) |
|
Block 15, Bellevue Court |
Residential |
Free Field |
CM16 |
E52505 |
Hung Yan House, Hung Fuk Estate |
Residential |
Façade |
CM18 (2) |
ESPT06 |
No. 201, Shek Po Tsuen |
Residential |
Free Field |
CM20 (2) |
ESCL03 |
No. 45, Sha Chau Lei Tsuen |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM28 (2) |
42001 |
Planned Residential Development in Site 4-20 |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM29 (2) |
42251 |
Planned Residential Development in Site 4-22 |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM31(2) |
52408 |
Planned Residential Development in Site 5-24 |
Residential |
Free-Field |
CM32 (2) |
52151 |
Planned School in Site 5-21 |
Educational Institution |
Free-Field |
Notes:
(1) Alternative noise monitoring stations to replace the original noise monitoring stations in accordance with the Proposal of Alternative Monitoring Locations approved by EPD.
(2) For Free Field measurement, +3 dB(A) should be added to the measured results.
3.2.2 As confirmed with ER, the planned residential development at Site 4-20, Site 5-22 and Site 5-24, and the planned school at Site 5-21 are not constructed yet. Thus, the impact noise monitoring will be carried out at monitoring stations CM28, CM29, CM31 and CM32 after the construction and occupation of these planned residential development and the planned school. No noise monitoring of the mentioned stations was carried out in this reporting period. 3.3 Noise Monitoring Parameter, Frequency and Duration 3.3.1 Construction noise level was measured by the ET and measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq). Leq(30mins) used as the monitoring parameter for the construction noise monitoring. 3.3.2 As supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and L90 were also obtained for reference. 3.3.3 Table 3.2 summarizes the monitoring parameters, duration, and frequency of construction noise monitoring.Table 3.2 Construction Noise Monitoring Parameter, Frequency and Duration
Monitoring Station |
Parameter |
Frequency and Duration |
CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4a, CM10, CM13, CM14, CM15a, CM16, CM18 and CM20 |
Leq(30mins), L10 and L90 |
Once every week throughout the construction phase |
§ For façade measurement, the monitoring station was set at a point 1 m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers building façade and set at a position 1.2 m above the ground. For free-field measurement, the monitoring station was set at a position 1.2 m above the ground.
§ The battery condition was checked to ensure good functioning of the meter.
§ Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the interval were set as follows:
- Frequency weighting: A
- Time weighting: Fast
- Interval: 30 minutes (Leq(30mins))
§ Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using an acoustic calibrator for 94.0 dB at 1000 Hz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement is more than 1.0 dB, the measurement was considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement will be required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
§ At the end of the monitoring period, the values of Leq, L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
3.4.5 Table 3.3 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment used during the construction noise monitoring. Calibration certificates for the impact noise monitoring equipment are attached in Appendix 3.1.Table 3.3 Construction Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Manufacturer |
Model |
No. of Equipment |
Serial No. |
Sound Level Meter |
Nti Audio |
XL3 |
2 |
A3A-01229-F0 A3A-01230-F0 |
Acoustic Calibrator |
Rion |
NC-75 |
2 |
34724244 34724245 |
§ The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator were regularly cleaned with a soft cloth; and
§ The sound level meter and acoustic calibrator were calibrated annually; and
§ The accuracy of the sound level meter was checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known frequency immediately prior to and following each noise measurement. Measurements were accepted as valid only if the calibration level from before and after the noise measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.
3.6 Action and Limit Levels 3.6.1 The Action and Limit levels were established in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022). Table 3.4 presents the Action and Limit Levels for construction noise. Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event and Action Plan presented in Appendix 3.3 shall be carried out.Table 3.4 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise Monitoring
Time Period |
Action |
Limit Level |
07:00 19:00 on normal weekdays |
When one or more documented complaints are received |
75 dB(A)(1) |
Notes:
(1) Between 07:00 and 19:00, construction noise limit for school during normal term time is 70 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) during examination period.
3.7 Results and Observations 3.7.1 All air quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting period. The air quality monitoring schedule for this reporting period is shown in Appendix 1.4. 3.7.2 No Action or Limit levels exceedance was recorded in the reporting period. Details of the results and graphical presentation are shown in Appendix 3.2. The construction noise monitoring results are summarized in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Date |
Measured Noise Level: Leq(30min), dB(A) |
Measured Noise Level with façade correction: Leq(30min), dB(A) (1) |
Baseline Level, dB(A) |
Construction Noise Level: Leq(30min), dB(A) (3) |
CM1 (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
60.6 |
63.6 |
58.7 |
61.9 |
12/12/2024 |
58.2 |
61.2 |
58.7 |
57.6 |
17/12/2024 |
59.3 |
62.3 |
58.7 |
59.8 |
24/12/2024 |
54.6 |
57.6 |
58.7 |
57.6 measured level ≤ baseline level |
31/12/2024 |
56.6 |
59.6 |
58.7 |
52.4 |
CM2 (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
70.4 |
73.4 |
64.2 |
72.8 |
12/12/2024 |
71.9 |
74.9 |
64.2 |
74.5 |
17/12/2024 |
70.9 |
73.9 |
64.2 |
73.4 |
24/12/2024 |
68.9 |
71.9 |
64.2 |
71.0 |
31/12/2024 |
70.7 |
73.7 |
64.2 |
73.1 |
CM3 (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
65.8 |
68.8 |
71.5 |
68.8 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
67.0 |
70.0 |
71.5 |
70.0 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
66.2 |
69.2 |
71.5 |
69.2 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
69.3 |
72.3 |
71.5 |
64.7 |
31/12/2024 |
70.7 |
73.7 |
71.5 |
69.7 |
CM4a (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
60.7 |
63.7 |
75.0 |
63. 7 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
62.2 |
65.2 |
75.0 |
65.2 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
61.4 |
64.4 |
75.0 |
64.4 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
73.8 |
76.8 |
75.0 |
72.1 |
31/12/2024 |
63.5 |
66.5 |
75.0 |
66.5 measured level ≤ baseline level |
CM10 (2) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
57.6 |
N/A |
60.9 |
57.6 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
58.3 |
N/A |
60.9 |
58.3 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
56.7 |
N/A |
60.9 |
56.7 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
56.8 |
N/A |
60.9 |
56.8 measured level ≤ baseline level |
31/12/2024 |
57.3 |
N/A |
60.9 |
57.3 measured level ≤ baseline level |
Date |
Measured Noise Level: Leq(30min), dB(A) |
Measured Noise Level with façade correction: Leq(30min), dB(A) (1) |
Baseline Level, dB(A) |
Construction Noise Level: Leq(30min), dB(A) (3) |
CM13 |
||||
03/12/2024 |
51.3 |
N/A |
54.4 |
51.3 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
50.9 |
N/A |
54.4 |
50.9 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
52.6 |
N/A |
54.4 |
52.6 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
52.0 |
N/A |
54.4 |
52.0 measured level ≤ baseline level |
31/12/2024 |
50.3 |
N/A |
54.4 |
50.3 measured level ≤ baseline level |
CM14 (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
57.7 |
60.7 |
47.4 |
60.5 |
12/12/2024 |
51.3 |
54.3 |
47.4 |
53.3 |
17/12/2024 |
51.6 |
54.6 |
47.4 |
53.7 |
24/12/2024 |
55.4 |
58.4 |
47.4 |
58.0 |
31/12/2024 |
55.7 |
58.7 |
47.4 |
58.3 |
CM15a (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
57.6 |
60.6 |
64.7 |
60.6 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
60.1 |
63.1 |
64.7 |
63.1 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
58.3 |
61.3 |
64.7 |
61.3 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
69.2 |
72.2 |
64.7 |
71.3 |
31/12/2024 |
67.8 |
70.8 |
64.7 |
69.5 |
CM16 |
||||
03/12/2024 |
62.5 |
N/A |
71.9 |
62.5 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
63.4 |
N/A |
71.9 |
63.4 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
63.0 |
N/A |
71.9 |
63.0 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
63.2 |
N/A |
71.9 |
63.2 measured level ≤ baseline level |
31/12/2024 |
59.4 |
N/A |
71.9 |
59.4 measured level ≤ baseline level |
CM18 (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
65.9 |
68.9 |
56.6 |
68.6 |
12/12/2024 |
64.4 |
67.4 |
56.6 |
67.0 |
17/12/2024 |
69.7 |
72.7 |
56.6 |
72.6 |
24/12/2024 |
64.2 |
67.2 |
56.6 |
66.8 |
31/12/2024 |
57.1 |
60.1 |
56.6 |
57.5 |
CM20 (1) |
||||
03/12/2024 |
53.1 |
56.1 |
57.8 |
56.1 measured level ≤ baseline level |
12/12/2024 |
50.8 |
53.8 |
57.8 |
53.8 measured level ≤ baseline level |
17/12/2024 |
51.7 |
54.7 |
57.8 |
54.7 measured level ≤ baseline level |
24/12/2024 |
55.1 |
58.1 |
57.8 |
46.3 |
31/12/2024 |
53.7 |
56.7 |
57.8 |
56.7 measured level ≤ baseline level |
Note:
(1) For Free Field measurement, +3 dB(A) was added to the measured results.
(2) Between 07:00 and 19:00, construction noise limit for school during normal term time is 70 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) during examination period.
(3) The measured noise level was corrected with the corresponding baseline noise level erasing any non-project related noise from the background (e.g. traffic noise, etc.) recorded during the monitoring periods.
3.7.3 During the construction noise monitoring period, road traffic noise may potentially affect the results obtained from CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4a, CM10, CM13 CM14, CM15a CM16, CM18 and CM20. 3.8 Event and Action Plan 3.8.1 Should non-compliance of the noise monitoring criteria occur, actions in accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Appendix 3.3 shall be carried out.4 Water Quality 4.1 Monitoring Requirement 4.1.1 In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), impact water quality monitoring should be carried out three days per week at all designated monitoring stations during the construction period. The interval between two sets of monitoring should not be less than 36 hours. 4.1.2 Replicate in-situ measurements of dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, turbidity, pH, and suspended solids (SS) for each independent sampling event shall be collected to ensure a robust statistically interpretable database. 4.2 Monitoring Location 4.2.1 Impact water quality monitoring in related to the works contracts in the reporting period was conducted at 12 monitoring stations which is summarized in Table 4.1. The location of water quality monitoring stations is shown in Figure 4.1.
Table 4.1 Summary of Impact Water Quality Monitoring Stations in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Fresh Water System |
Monitoring Station ID |
Coordinates (HK Grid) |
Description (1) |
|
Easting |
Northing |
|||
TSW Main Channel and its tributaries |
U2 |
816240 |
834009 |
U |
U5a (2) |
816212 |
832138 |
U |
|
U6a (2) |
817666 |
832421 |
U |
|
TS1 |
816815 |
832297 |
G |
|
TS2a (2) |
817278 |
833493 |
G |
|
TSR1a (2) |
817786 |
834125 |
G |
|
HT |
816866 |
834314 |
G |
|
LUTa (2) |
817547 |
834717 |
G |
|
D2a (2) |
817483 |
835855 |
I |
|
Tuen Mun River |
D3 |
816437 |
831500 |
I |
Upstream / Tributaries of Shan Pui River (3) |
D5a (2) |
819054 |
832288 |
I |
D6a (2) |
818934 |
832032 |
I |
Notes:
(1) G: Gradient Station; I: Impact Station; U: Upstream Station.
(2) U5a, U6a, TS2a, TSR1a, LUTa, D2a, D5a and D6a are the alternative water quality monitoring stations to replace U5, U6, TS2, TSR1, LUT, D2, D5 and D6, respectively, in accordance with the agreed Proposal of Alternative Monitoring Locations.
(3) The original monitoring station (i.e. U7) had been cancelled owing to the location was on a steep slope within densely vegetated area in which no water flowing through in wet season in accordance with the Proposal of Alternative Monitoring Locations.
4.3 Monitoring Parameter and Frequency 4.3.1 The monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of impact water quality monitoring are listed in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 Parameters measured in the Impact Water Quality Monitoring
Parameter |
Frequency |
Duration |
Dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, turbidity, pH, stream water depth and suspended solids (SS) |
3 days in a week |
Throughout the construction phase |
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Measuring Equipment
4.5.2 The instrument for measuring dissolved oxygen and temperature should be portable and weatherproof complete with cable, sensor, and use DC power source. The equipment was capable of measuring:§ A dissolved oxygen level in the range of 0 50 mg/L and 0 500% saturation; and
§ The temperature within -5 50 °C.
4.5.3 It should have a membrane electrode with automatic temperature compensation connected with a cable. Sufficient stocks of spare electrodes and cables should be available for replacement where necessary (e.g. YSI ProDSS (multi-parameters) or an approved similar instrument).
pH
4.5.4 pH meter (e.g. YSI ProDSS (multi-parameters) or equivalent) should be used to measure pH value of water samples in-situ. It should be readable in a range of 0 to 14. Standard buffer solutions of at least pH 7 to pH 10 shall be used for calibration of the instrument before and after use.
Turbidity Measurement Equipment
4.5.5 The instrument should be a portable, weatherproof turbidity-measuring instrument with a comprehensive operation manual. The equipment should use a DC power source. It should have a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0 4000 NTU and be equipped with a cable (e.g. YSI ProDSS (multi-parameters) or an approved similar instrument).
Suspended Solids
4.5.6 A water sampler should comprise a transparent PVC cylinder, with a capacity of not less than 2 litres, and should be effectively sealed with latex cups at both ends. The sampler should have a positive latching system to keep it open and prevent premature closure until released by a messenger when the sampler is at the selected water depth (e.g. Wildco 2.2L Water Sampler or an approved similar instrument). 4.5.7 Water samples for suspended solids measurement shall be collected in high density polythene bottles, packed in ice (chilled to 4 °C without being frozen), and delivered to the laboratory as soon as possible after collection.
Water Depth Detector
4.5.8 A portable, battery-operated echo sounder should be used for determining water depth at each designated monitoring station. 4.5.9 For shallow water (less than 1 m deep), a portable water depth ruler in a range 0 7m should be used to measure water depth.
Monitoring Position Equipment
4.5.10 A hand-held or boat-fixed digital Global Positioning System (GPS) or other equivalent instrument of similar accuracy shall be provided and used during water quality monitoring to ensure the water sampling locations are correct during water quality monitoring work.
Water Sampling Equipment
4.5.11 A transparent PVC or glass cylinder, which has a volume of not less than 2 litres and can be sealed at both ends with cups, should be equipped with a positive latching system. During the water sampling, a messenger is released to trigger the closure of the water sampler at suitable water depth. 4.5.12 For sampling location with shallow water depth, plastic bucket would be used instead.
Calibration of In-situ Instruments
4.5.13 All in-situ monitoring instruments should be checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or another international accreditation scheme before use, and subsequently re-calibrated at 3-monthly intervals throughout all stages of the water quality monitoring. Responses of sensors and electrodes should be checked with certified standard solutions before each use. Wet bulb calibration for a DO meter should be carried out before measurement at each monitoring location.
Back-up Equipment
4.5.14 Sufficient stocks of spare parts should be maintained for replacements when necessary. Backup monitoring equipment shall also be made available so that monitoring can proceed uninterruptedly even when some equipment is under maintenance, calibration, etc. 4.5.15 Table 4.3 summarizes the equipment used in the water quality monitoring programme. Copies of the calibration certificates of multi-parameter water quality monitoring system are shown in Appendix 4.1.Table 4.3 Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Quantity |
Serial No. |
Parameter |
Range |
Accuracy |
Water Sampler |
Wildco 2.2L Water Sampler with messenger or plastic bucket (used in shallow water depth) |
1 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Multi-functional Water Quality Meter |
YSI ProDSS (multi-parameters) |
1 |
15M101091
|
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) |
0 to 500% |
· 0 to 200%: ±1% of reading · 200 to 500%: ±8% of reading |
0 to 50 mg/L |
· 0 to 20 mg/L: ±0.1 mg/L or 1% of reading, whichever is greater · 20 to 50 mg/L: ±8% of reading |
|||||
Temperature |
-5 to 50 °C |
±0.2 °C |
||||
pH |
0 to 14 pH units |
±0.2 pH units |
||||
Turbidity |
0 to 4000 NTU |
· 0 to 999 NTU: 0.3 NTU or ±2% of reading, whichever is greater · 1000 to 4000 NTU: ±5% of reading |
||||
Water Depth Ruler |
鼎峯0708 |
1 |
NA* |
Water depth |
0 7 m (Used for water depth less than 1 m) |
±0.01 m |
Positioning Equipment |
Garmin (GPSmap 78s) |
1 |
1WL223754 |
Positioning |
N/A |
GPS: ±1m |
Laboratory Analytical Methods
4.6.6 Analysis of SS was carried out by a HOKLAS accredited laboratory (Acumen Laboratory and Testing Limited). At least two replicate samples from each independent sampling event were collected for the SS measurement. Sufficient water samples (about 3,000 mL) were collected at the monitoring stations for carrying out the laboratory SS determination. The analytical method for suspended solids is presented in Table 4.4.Table 4.4 Method for Laboratory Analysis for Water Samples
Parameters |
Analytical Method |
Detection Limit |
Suspended Solid (SS) |
APHA 2540D (1) |
1 mg/L |
Note:
(1) APHA American Public Health Association Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.
4.7 QA/QC Requirements
Decontamination Procedures
4.7.1 Water sampling equipment used during the course of the monitoring process was decontaminated by manual washing and rinsed with distilled water after each sampling event. All of the disposable components/ accessories were discarded after sampling.
Sampling Management and Supervision
4.7.2 All sampling bottles were labelled with the sample ID numbers (including the sampling station), and sampling date. Water samples were dispatched to the testing laboratory for analysis as soon as possible. All the collected samples were stored in a cool box to keep the temperature less than 4 as possible after the sampling. All samples were stored in a cool box and kept at less than 4 °C but without frozen. All water samples were handled under chain of custody protocols and relinquished to the laboratory representatives at locations specified by the laboratory.
Quality Control Measures for Sample Testing
4.7.3 Quality control of laboratory analysis of water samples was performed by Acumen Laboratory and Testing Limited for every batch of 20 samples:§ A minimum of 1 laboratory method blank was analyzed;
§ A minimum of 1 sample duplicate was analyzed; and
§ A minimum of 1 sample matrix spike was analyzed.
4.8 Action and Limit Level for Water Quality Monitoring 4.8.1 The criteria of action and limit levels for water quality monitoring are defined in Table 4.5.Table 4.5 Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
DO in mg/L |
< 5%-ile of baseline data |
< 4 mg/L or < 1%-ile of baseline data |
SS in mg/L |
> 95%-ile of baseline data |
> 99%-ile of baseline data |
Turbidity in NTU |
> 95%-ile of baseline data |
> 99%-ile of baseline data |
pH |
Beyond the range 6.6 to 8.4 |
Beyond the range of 6.5 to 8.5 |
(1) For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limit occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limit.
(2) For SS and turbidity, non-compliance of the water quality limit occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limit.
(3) All the figures given in the table are used for reference only and the EPD may amend the figures whenever it is considered necessary.
4.8.2 Based on the criteria listed in Table 4.5, the action and limit levels for water quality are determined in Table 4.6.Table 4.6 Action and Limit Levels of Water Quality
Fresh Water System |
Monitoring Station ID |
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
TSW Main Channel and its tributaries |
D2a |
DO in mg/L |
5.4 |
4 (1) |
SS in mg/L |
14.0 |
15.6 |
||
Turbidity in NTU |
11.6 |
11.7 |
||
pH |
Less than 6.6 or greater than 8.4 |
Less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5 |
||
Tuen Mun River |
D3 |
DO in mg/L |
4.9 |
4 (2) |
SS in mg/L |
59.4 |
67.4 |
||
Turbidity in NTU |
10.8 |
11.1 |
||
pH |
Less than 6.6 or greater than 8.4 |
Less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5 |
||
Upstream / Tributaries of Shan Pui River (4) |
D5a |
DO in mg/L |
5.2 |
4 (3) |
SS in mg/L |
27.5 |
264.3 |
||
Turbidity in NTU |
19.3 |
19.4 |
||
pH |
Less than 6.6 or greater than 8.4 |
Less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5 |
||
D6a |
DO in mg/L |
6.9 |
4 (4) |
|
SS in mg/L |
16.3 |
18.3 |
||
Turbidity in NTU |
14.8 |
14.9 |
||
pH |
Less than 6.6 or greater than 8.4 |
Less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5 |
(1) The 1%-ile of baseline DO data at D2a is 5.4 mg/L, which is higher than 4 mg/L. Thus, DO concentration of 4 mg/L, which is in line with the Water Quality Objectives, is adopted as the limit level.
(2) The 1%-ile of baseline DO data at D3 is 4.8 mg/L, which is higher than 4 mg/L. Thus, DO concentration of 4 mg/L, which is in line with the Water Quality Objectives, is adopted as the limit level.
(3) The 1%-ile of baseline DO data at D5a is 5.1 mg/L, which is higher than 4 mg/L. Thus, DO concentration of 4 mg/L, which is in line with the Water Quality Objectives, is adopted as the limit level.
(4) The 1%-ile of baseline DO data at D6a is 6.9 mg/L, which is higher than 4 mg/L. Thus, DO concentration of 4 mg/L, which is in line with the Water Quality Objectives, is adopted as the limit level.
4.9 Results and Observations 4.9.1 All water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting period. The water quality monitoring schedule for this reporting period is shown in Appendix 1.4. The monitoring results and graphical presentation of water quality monitoring at the monitoring stations are shown in Appendix 4.2. 4.9.2 During the previous reporting period (November 2024), 3 action level of exceedances for DO were recorded. 10 limit level of exceedances for turbidity were recorded. 5 action level of exceedances for SS were recorded. 7 limit level of exceedances for pH were recorded. Summaries of exceedance records are shown in Table 4.7 and Table 4.8. After investigation, all the exceedances are considered as non-project related.Table 4.7 Summary of Exceedance Records of Water Quality Monitoring in related to the works contracts in the previous reporting period (November 2024)
Date |
Monitoring Station |
Parameter (Unit) |
Averaged Measured Value |
Exceedance |
Exceedances due to the Project |
|
Action Level (AL) |
Limit Level (LL) |
|||||
1 November 2024 |
D2a |
SS in mg/L |
14.7 |
✓ |
|
× |
D6a |
Turbidity in NTU |
17.8 |
|
✓ |
||
4 November 2024 |
D5a |
pH |
9.4 |
|
✓ |
× |
Turbidity in NTU |
55.1 |
|
✓ |
|||
SS in mg/L |
39.0 |
✓ |
|
|||
D6a |
Turbidity in NTU |
17.2 |
|
✓ |
||
6 November 2024 |
D5a |
pH |
11.0 |
|
✓ |
× |
Turbidity in NTU |
46.8 |
|
✓ |
|||
D6a |
DO in mg/L |
6.2 |
✓ |
|
||
8 November 2024 |
D3 |
pH |
6.2 |
|
✓ |
× |
Turbidity in NTU |
25.8 |
|
✓ |
|||
D5a |
pH |
11.2 |
|
✓ |
||
Turbidity in NTU |
60.9 |
|
✓ |
|||
SS in mg/L |
65.3 |
✓ |
|
|||
D6a |
pH |
8.9 |
|
✓ |
||
Turbidity in NTU |
17.5 |
|
✓ |
|||
11 November 2024 |
D3 |
Turbidity in NTU |
21.9 |
|
✓ |
× |
D5a |
pH |
6.4 |
|
✓ |
||
13 November 2024 |
D5a |
pH |
9.5 |
|
✓ |
× |
Turbidity in NTU |
19.8 |
|
✓ |
|||
SS in mg/L |
49.4 |
✓ |
|
|||
D6a |
Turbidity in NTU |
15.8 |
|
✓ |
||
18 November 2024 |
D2a |
DO in mg/L |
5.0 |
✓ |
|
× |
25 November 2024 |
D5a |
SS in mg/L |
34.0 |
✓ |
|
× |
29 November 2024 |
D2a |
DO in mg/L |
4.9 |
✓ |
|
× |
Table 4.8 Summary of Exceedance Records of Water Quality Monitoring in related to the works contracts in the previous reporting period (November 2024)
Parameter |
No. of exceedances |
Total No. exceedances |
No. of non-project related exceedances |
Total No. of non-project related exceedances |
No. of exceedance related to the Project |
Total No. of exceedance related to the Project |
|||
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
||||
Dissolved Oxygen |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Turbidity |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Suspended Solids |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
pH |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 4.9 Summary of Exceedance Records of Water Quality Monitoring in related to the works contracts in the reporting period
Parameter |
No. of exceedances |
Total No. exceedances |
No. of non-project related exceedances |
Total No. of non-project related exceedances |
No. of exceedance related to the Project |
Total No. of exceedance related to the Project |
|||
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
||||
Dissolved Oxygen |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Turbidity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Suspended Solids |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
pH |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.10 Event and Action Plan 4.10.1 Should any non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Appendix 4.4 shall be followed. Investigation of the exceedances of environmental quality performance limits should be conducted, and the ET will immediately notify the IEC and EPD, as appropriate. The notification should be followed up with advice to the IEC and EPD on the results of the investigation, proposed actions and success of the action taken, with any necessary follow-up proposals.
5 Waste Management 5.1.1 Waste generated from the Project include inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials and non-inert C&D wastes in the reporting period. The summarized amount of waste generated by the construction works in related to the works contracts in the reporting period is shown in Table 5.1 respectively. The cumulative waste flow table of the Project was presented in in Appendix 5.1.
Table 5.1 Summary of Waste Generated by the Construction Works in related to the Works Contracts in the Reporting Period
Month |
Actual Quantalities of Inert C&D Materials Generated Monthly |
Actual Quantities of C&D Wastes Generated Monthly |
|||||||||
Total Quantity Generated |
Hard Rock and Lage Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
Metals |
Paper / Carboard Packing |
Plastics |
Chemical Waste |
Others e.g., general refuse |
|
(in 000m3) |
(in 000m3) |
(in 000m3) |
(in 000m3) |
(in 000m3) |
(in 000m3) |
(in 000kg) |
(in 000kg) |
(in 000kg) |
(in 000kg) |
(in 000m3) |
|
December 2024 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
14.66 |
Table 6.1 Schedule for Bat Roost Survey at Contract 2 during the Reporting Period
Survey Date |
Findings observed during the survey |
2-Dec-24 |
N/A |
16-Dec-24 |
N/A |
30-Dec-24 |
N/A |
Table 6.2 Upcoming Schedule for Bat Roost Survey at Contract 2 in the Next Reporting Period
|
Survey Date (1) |
1st Survey |
10-Jan-25 |
2nd Survey |
22-Jan-25 |
Notes:
(1) The schedule may be updated depends on tell-felling progress or adverse weather condition.
7 Landscape and Visual 7.1 Audit Requirements 7.1.1 According to the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022), site audits should be undertaken at least once every two weeks during the construction period, by a Registered Landscape Architect (RLA). Particularly, to check that the proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures are properly implemented and maintained as per their intended objectives. Mitigation measures recommended in the EIA Report as the audit requirements including, preservation of existing vegetation, transplanting of affected trees, compensatory tree planting, control of night-time lighting glare, erection of decorative screen hoarding and management of construction activities and facilities are summarized in Appendix 1.3. 7.2 Results and Observations 7.2.1 Bi-weekly landscape and visual site audits were carried out by a Registered Landscape Architect (RLA) on 6 and 20 December 2024. No particular observation was recorded in this reporting period. 7.3 Event and Action Plan 7.3.1 Should any non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Appendix 7.1 shall be followed.
Table 8.1 Site Observations at Contract 1 during the reporting period
Date |
Kay Observations/ Reminders |
Follow-up Action |
6 December 2024 |
No major environmental deficiency was observed during the site inspection. |
Nil |
13 December 2024 |
Reminder: 1. Stagnant water in drip tray should be cleaned up at Ha Ko Po site office. |
Nil |
20 December 2024 |
No major environmental deficiency was observed during the site inspection. |
Nil |
27 December 2024 |
No major environmental deficiency was observed during the site inspection. |
Nil |
Table 8.2 Site Observations at Contract 2 during the reporting period
Date |
Kay Observations/ Reminders |
Follow-up Action |
6 December 2024 |
Reminder: 1. Tree near T030 should be reviewed for further protection or not. |
Nil |
10 December 2024 |
No major environmental deficiency was observed during the site inspection. |
Nil |
20 December 2024 |
No major environmental deficiency was observed during the site inspection. |
Nil |
27 December 2024 |
No major environmental deficiency was observed during the site inspection. |
Nil |
9 Summary of Monitoring Exceedance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecutions 9.1 Summary of Exceedance 9.1.1 No Action Level or Limit Level exceedance was recorded for air quality monitoring in the reporting period. 9.1.2 No Action Level or Limit Level exceedance was recorded for construction noise monitoring in the reporting period. 9.1.3 During the previous reporting period (November 2024), 3 action level of exceedances for DO were recorded. 10 limit level of exceedances for turbidity were recorded. 5 action level of exceedances for SS were recorded. 7 limit level of exceedances for pH were recorded. After investigation, all the exceedances are considered as non-project related. 9.1.4 All water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting period. No Action or Limit Level exceedance was recorded during impact water quality monitoring in the reporting period. 9.2 Summary of Environmental Non-Compliance 9.2.1 No environmental non-compliance was recorded in the reporting period. 9.3 Summary of Environmental Complaint 9.3.1 No environmental complaint was received in the reporting period. The Cumulative Complaint Log is presented in Appendix 9.1. 9.4 Summary of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecution 9.4.1 There was no successful environmental prosecution or notification of summons received since the Project commencement. The Cumulative Log for environmental summon and successful prosecution is presented in Appendix 9.1.
10 Future Key Issues 10.1 Works and Potential Environmental Issues in the next Reporting Period 10.1.1 The Impact Monitoring Schedule for the Project for the next reporting period is presented in Appendix 10.1. 10.1.2 Works to be undertaken in the next reporting period are summarized below, and in Figure 1.2 and Figure 1.3 respectively:
· Caring Visit;
· Tree Survey;
· Site Appraisal;
· Underground Utility Detection;
· Ground Investigation Works;
· Realign of Bar Fencing;
· Demolition Works;
· Utilities Laying Works;
· Construction of CLC & PMs Office Footing.
Contract 2
· Site Survey;
· Tree Felling;
· Ground Investigation Works;
· Tree Transplant;
· Earthworks;
· Piezometer / Standpipe Installation;
· Site Office Setup.
10.1.3 Potential environmental impacts arising from the above construction activities are mainly associated with construction noise impact, water quality impact, ecological impact, waste management, and landscape and visual. 10.2 Recommendation 10.2.1 The key environmental mitigation measures for the Project in the coming reporting period expected to be associated with the construction activities include:Dust
· Regular watering to reduce dust emissions from exposed site surface;
· Stockpile of dusty materials shall be covered entirely by impervious sheeting;
· Provide vehicles washing facilities at all site exits to wash away any dusty materials from vehicle body;
· NRMM Labels should be displayed on the applicable equipment on site by the Contractor;
· Provision of water sprinklers along the haul road for dust suppression.
Noise
§ Only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site, and plant should be maintained regularly during the construction programme; and
§ Quality Powered Mechanical Equipment (QPME) should be adopted as far as possible.
Water Quality
§ No effluent discharge would be allowed before acquired the effluent discharge license;
§ Surface run-off from construction sites should be discharged into dedicated discharge point via adequately designed sand/ silt removal facilities;
§ Channels/ earth bunds/ sandbags barriers should be provided on site to properly direct stormwater to silt removal facilities;
§ Silt removal facilities, channels and manholes should be maintained, and the deposited silt and grit should be removed regularly;
§ Open stockpiles of construction materials on sites should be covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric during rainstorms; and
§ Perimeter channels should be provided on site boundaries where necessary to intercept stormwater run-off from outside the site so that it will not wash across the site.
Waste Management
§ Provision of sufficient waste disposal points and regular collection of waste;
§ Regular cleaning and maintenance programme for drainage system; and
§ Chemical containers shall be stored with drip tray underneath.
Landscape and Visual
§ Construction activities shall be carefully designed to minimize impact on existing retained trees
10.2.2 The tentative schedule of regular air quality, construction noise and water quality monitoring in the next reporting period is presented in Appendix 10.1. The regular impact air quality, noise and water quality monitoring will be conducted at the same monitoring locations in the next reporting period.11 Conclusions 11.1 Conclusion 11.1.1 This 2nd Monthly EM&A Report presents the EM&A works at Contract 1 and Contract 2 under the Project during the reporting period from 1 December to 31 December 2024 in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual (Apr 2022). 11.1.2 No Action Level or Limit Level exceedance was recorded for air quality monitoring in the reporting period. 11.1.3 During the previous reporting period (November 2024), 3 action level of exceedances for DO were recorded. 10 limit level of exceedances for turbidity were recorded. 5 action level of exceedances for SS were recorded. 7 limit level of exceedances for pH were recorded. After investigation, all the exceedances are considered as non-project related. 11.1.4 All water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting period. No Action or Limit Level exceedance was recorded during impact water quality monitoring in the reporting period. 11.1.5 Environmental site inspections were conducted at Contract 1 on 6, 13, 20 and 27 December 2024. Environmental site inspections were conducted at Contract 2 out on 6, 10, 20 and 27 December 2024. 11.1.6 No environmental complaint was received in the reporting period. 11.1.7 No notification of summons and prosecution was received in the reporting period. 11.1.8 The ET will keep track on the construction works to confirm compliance of environmental requirements and the proper implementation of all necessary mitigation measures. 11.1.9 No change to the EM&A programme was made in this reporting period. 11.2 Comments/ Recommendations 11.2.1 The proposed mitigation measures were properly implemented and were considered effective and efficient in pollution control.